Why Georgia-Pacific bet the future of programmatic on supply, not demand
Georgia-Pacific cut its SSPs by 80%. Here’s what it learned about supply-side control.
本条来自 Digiday（Marketing / 媒体），聚焦 brand、ai。 Georgia-Pacific didn’t set out to prove a point about programmatic’s future in 2024. It set out to stop wasting money on 30-odd SSPs that all appeared to be selling more or less the same inventory. Two and a half years later, that’s more or less what happened anyway.
Georgia-Pacific cut its SSPs by 80%
- Georgia-Pacific didn’t set out to prove a point about programmatic’s future in 2024
Georgia-Pacific cut its SSPs by 80%
Here’s what it learned about supply-side control
Georgia-Pacific didn’t set out to prove a point about programmatic’s future in 2024. It set out to stop wasting money on 30-odd SSPs that all appeared to be selling more or less the same inventory. Two and a half years later, that’s more or less what happened anyway.
“The future of the programmatic space sits on the supply side,” said Paras Shah, Georgia-Pacific’s senior director of digital media.
It’s fair to say Georgia-Pacific arrived at that view rather than started with it. The first leg of this journey was spent almost entirely on the other side. Continue reading this article on digiday.com . Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.
本条目归入「Brand Marketing」垂直，涉及真实话题：brand、ai。
· 市场：关注 brand、ai 对相关品类与竞争格局的潜在影响。
· 消费者：受众行为与偏好变化值得追踪。
· 品牌：本动向对品牌资产建设的启示。
· 渠道：内容分发与触点组合（社媒 / 电商 / 线下）的协同值得复盘。
· 核心话题：brand、ai。
· 可思考：如何把「brand」的洞察，转化为可衡量的内容与增长动作？
面试中可引用「Why Georgia-Pacific bet the future of programmatic on supply, not demand」：围绕 brand、ai，说明你对行业动向的判断与可落地动作。
本条目相关英文术语可在「商务英语」模块按话题检索，用于外企面试表达训练。
It’s fair to say Georgia-Pacific arrived at that view rather than started with it. The first leg of this journey was spent almost entirely on the other side. Continue reading this …
“The future of the programmatic space sits on the supply side,” said Paras Shah, Georgia-Pacific’s senior director of digital media.…